Application portfolio audit

Decide which applications to maintain, modernise, replace or retire.

IKNSA connects business value, criticality, technical health, data, costs and dependencies to turn an application inventory into portfolio decisions.

Evidence chainObserve · qualify · prioritise
  1. Scope
  2. Findings
  3. Risks
  4. Trajectory

The decision point

Debt becomes manageable when it is connected to a decision and a business impact.

The audit consolidates the inventory, the owners, the usage, the interfaces and the costs, then digs into the applications whose failure, obsolescence or rigidity most limits the trajectory. Options are compared without imposing a rewrite as the default answer.

TriggerObsolescence, diffuse costs or a blocked transformation
ScopeApplications, data, interfaces, contracts and skills
Expected outputPortfolio segmentation and modernisation waves

Working scope

The dimensions examined together.

The framing avoids treating separately subjects that condition one another. The final scope remains adapted to the organisation and its priorities.

  1. Business value, usage and criticality
  2. Architecture, code and maintainability
  3. Data, interfaces and dependencies
  4. Security, support and obsolescence
  5. Costs, licences and vendors
  6. Skills, documentation and exit options

A usable result

A portfolio segmented by decision, not just by technology.

Each application joins a trajectory: invest, contain, migrate, replace or retire. The sequence takes account of data dependencies, business windows and team capacity.

  1. 01Qualified inventory and dependency map
  2. 02Value, risk, cost and technical-health matrix
  3. 03Scenarios per application or domain
  4. 04Modernisation waves and governance decisions

Method

An engagement that stays readable from scope to decision.

01

Scope

Fix the entities, services, assets, periods and frameworks actually examined.

02

Observe

Cross-check interviews, documents, configurations and operational results without relying on declarations alone.

03

Prioritise

Connect each finding to its business impact, its likelihood and the controls already in place.

04

Decide

Produce a costed trajectory with owners, deadlines, dependencies and expected evidence.

Point of vigilance

What the engagement must make explicit.

An automatic score is not enough to decide an application's retirement. Migration constraints, local usage, historical data and invisible dependencies must be confronted with the business.

The first conversation verifies the context, the level of urgency, the stakeholders and the output genuinely expected.

Frame this engagement See Applications & data Start with a guided assessment

First conversation

Let’s discuss the next point of control for your information system.

A project to frame, operations to take over, compliance to demonstrate? Describe the context. You will get a first considered reading — not a generic brochure.