Cybersecurity audit
Measure the capacity to prevent, detect, respond and rebuild.
IKNSA assesses the cyber posture from the critical services, the attack scenarios and the operational results, then builds a trajectory compatible with the company's means.
Evidence chainObserve · qualify · prioritise
- Scope
- Findings
- Risks
- Trajectory
The decision point
Cyber posture is measured by the organisation's capability, not by the inventory of tools purchased.
The audit connects business risks, technical exposure, identities, vendors and continuity. It verifies that the controls exist, their coverage, their frequency and the results they produce — notably during incidents, tests and restorations.
Working scope
The dimensions examined together.
The framing avoids treating separately subjects that condition one another. The final scope remains adapted to the organisation and its priorities.
- Governance, risks and critical assets
- Identities, workstations, servers and network
- Vulnerabilities, patches and configurations
- Logs, detection and alert handling
- Incident response, backups and recovery
- Third parties, contracts and the supply chain
A usable result
A risk-reduction plan connected to the critical services.
Findings are ranked by plausible scenarios and business consequences. The roadmap separates immediate measures, foundations and capabilities to be proven through exercises.
- 01Posture map and priority scenarios
- 02Substantiated findings and control coverage
- 03Action plan by horizon and owner
- 04Risk indicators, tests and expected evidence
Method
An engagement that stays readable from scope to decision.
Scope
Fix the entities, services, assets, periods and frameworks actually examined.
Observe
Cross-check interviews, documents, configurations and operational results without relying on declarations alone.
Prioritise
Connect each finding to its business impact, its likelihood and the controls already in place.
Decide
Produce a costed trajectory with owners, deadlines, dependencies and expected evidence.
Point of vigilance
What the engagement must make explicit.
The level of assurance depends on the depth of the verifications and the sample. Limits, exclusions and unobserved elements must appear in the read-out to avoid unjustified confidence.
The first conversation verifies the context, the level of urgency, the stakeholders and the output genuinely expected.
Frame this engagement See the Cybersecurity practice Start with a guided assessmentFirst conversation
Let’s discuss the next point of control for your information system.
A project to frame, operations to take over, compliance to demonstrate? Describe the context. You will get a first considered reading — not a generic brochure.