RGAA accessibility audit
Assess the real journeys and build accessibility into the product cycle.
IKNSA frames applicability, sample, testing and remediation to produce a reading useful to product, technical, editorial and compliance teams.
Evidence chainObserve · qualify · prioritise
- Scope
- Findings
- Risks
- Trajectory
The decision point
Accessibility becomes durable when it joins the components, the content and the acceptance criteria.
The audit defines a representative sample of pages, features, templates and content, then combines automated and manual testing. Findings are grouped by cause to help the teams fix the structural components before the isolated occurrences.
Working scope
The dimensions examined together.
The framing avoids treating separately subjects that condition one another. The final scope remains adapted to the organisation and its priorities.
- Applicability and publication scope
- Structure, navigation and keyboard
- Forms, messages and interactions
- Images, media, tables and documents
- Contrast, zoom and assistive technologies
- Declaration, multi-year plan and governance
A usable result
Fixes organised by user impact and component.
The read-out distinguishes journey blockers, cross-cutting defects and editorial problems. The trajectory provides for correction, verification, publication and prevention within delivery.
- 01Scope, sample and test protocol
- 02Reproducible findings with user impact
- 03Remediation plan by component and priority
- 04Declaration elements and improvement governance
Method
An engagement that stays readable from scope to decision.
Scope
Fix the entities, services, assets, periods and frameworks actually examined.
Observe
Cross-check interviews, documents, configurations and operational results without relying on declarations alone.
Prioritise
Connect each finding to its business impact, its likelihood and the controls already in place.
Decide
Produce a costed trajectory with owners, deadlines, dependencies and expected evidence.
Point of vigilance
What the engagement must make explicit.
The compliance rate must come with the scope, the sample, the version of the framework and the audit's limits. It must not mask the blockers found in the essential journeys.
The first conversation verifies the context, the level of urgency, the stakeholders and the output genuinely expected.
Frame this engagement See Audit & compliance Start with a guided assessmentFirst conversation
Let’s discuss the next point of control for your information system.
A project to frame, operations to take over, compliance to demonstrate? Describe the context. You will get a first considered reading — not a generic brochure.